| PRESS RELEASE FROM: protesters against Coega,
including: Earthlife Africa, Nimble, The Zwartkops Trust, The Valley
Bushveld Affected Parties, The Citrus Farmers, Concerned Members of
the Public
COEGA'S TOXIC CLOUDS
While the rest of the world, including thousands of the world’s
leading scientists, politicians and economists are scrambling to
come up with solutions to what is potentially the biggest crisis we
have ever faced in the shape of Global Warming, the Coega
Development Corporation seems to know better than everyone else.
Faced with increasing public concern and protest, the CDC has gone
to great lengths in recent adverts in the local media to try to
discredit the opponents of the Coega smelters and some of the other
highly polluting and toxic industries the CDC is trying to attract,
such as the ferro-manganese smelter, the oil refinery and the
chlorine plant, and once again the CDC is doing its utmost to
misinform the public (The Herald, 9th May, 2007).
Therefore we would like to take the opportunity to tell a different
not quite as rosy side of the story. It will then be up to the
public to decide whether they would like to believe the claims of
the CDC or rather pay attention to the fact that communities all
over the world, including those in Trinidad, India, Iceland and our
very own Richard’s Bay are all complaining about the pollution and
destruction caused by the aluminium smelters in their vicinity.
The people of Port Elizabeth need to ask themselves whether, in
light of global warming, the pollution of our air and water and its
effects on people’s health and in consideration of the billions of
rand needed for the construction of new power plants, the provision
of subsidies for the smelter, the job losses in other industries
that can either not expand or exist due to the smelter’s proximity,
are worth the 1.000 jobs created by Alcan, of which at least 300
will only be available to highly skilled professionals, no doubt
many from overseas and whether there would not have been better,
environmentally friendly and sustainable means to create jobs. In
light of the fact that the cost of each job created at the smelter
is estimated to run to about R5 million and considering the massive
impact the smelters will have on our environment and the air we
breathe, the answer to this should be easy.
We reject the condescending manner with which Mrs. Vuyelwa Qinga
Vika, Head of Marketing and Communications at the CDC and others of
the CDC are trying to make protesters appear. Those who have voiced
their opposition against the smelters have been denounced as
egotistical half-wits, who are more concerned about clean air than
the plight of the poor; spewing “doomsday prophecies taken from the
internet”; fools that cannot distinguish fact from fiction, silly
enough to believe the reports by the world’s leading scientists and
politicians on Global Warming.
It is easy to understand Mrs. Vika’s dislike of us and the fact that
we are trying to inform the public about the truth – as it is the
lack of information to the public thus far, which has enabled the
CDC to execute their Environmental Impact Studies and other required
processes without enough public awareness and involvement. In fact
it is this very lack of information to and awareness of the public
which is so startling and worrying.
The whole sorry saga of the Coega development in an environmentally
highly sensitive, unsuitable area began with the highly
controversial and corrupt R30 billion weapons deal, which brought
us, as an offset deal, the Coega Industrial Development Zone. In
their desperate effort to secure the ever elusive anchor tenant
needed to justify the billions of Rand spent to date on Coega, the
CDC and government have bent over backwards and are now giving, in
addition to tax incentives, tax holidays and import/export duty
exemptions, large subsidies and rock bottom prices for our water and
electricity to the world’s most polluting and energy intensive
industries. These currently include the Alcan Aluminium Smelter – a
double sized smelter with two pot-lines, eight massive chimney
stacks and an output of 720.000 tons of Aluminium per year, making
it one of the world’s biggest aluminium smelters, which will use
three times as much electricity as our entire city. The sheer size
of the smelter boggles the mind – the entire area stretches over 120
ha of which 50 ha will be used for the actual plant.
As we all know, the capacity of our existing power stations is
already strained to breaking-point, so new power stations will have
to be built just to supply Alcan with the power it needs. This will
entail either the building of yet another coal powered plant, with
massive power grids snaking their way all the way through pristine
country, including game farms, or the construction of a nuclear
power plant on our doorstep - at additional costs to our environment
and to the tax payers pockets. Make no mistake - it will not be
Alcan who has to pay for the new infrastructure but the South
African taxpayer.
To address SA’s power shortages, Eskom will spend R150 billion over
the next five years and South Africans will be the ones footing the
bill, according to Eskom CEO Jacob Maroga. A price hike to the tune
of 18 per cent has been mooted - all this in a country where a large
percentage of our population has either got no excess to electricity
or cannot afford it.
Alcan, however, will receive our electricity for a price far below
anything that any of us or other industries are paying. Another
question that needs to be answered is, who, in times of power
shortages will have preference – the smelter or the South African
people?
This, of course, is only part of the problem. The Coega IDZ is
located in an environmentally highly sensitive and unique area. It
has 6 biomes and is situated right next to the Addo National
Elephant Park, close to various game and citrus farms, and not only
extremely close to the city of Port Elizabeth, but also right next
to one of our biggest townships, Motherwell.
The health implications for all are enormous, no matter what the CDC
would have us believe. Toxic emissions into air and our water,
include fluoride, sulphur dioxide, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons,
nitrogen dioxide, carbon dioxide, other greenhouse gases and others
– all of which have severe impacts, such as respiratory diseases,
cancers, Alzheimers disease, brittle bone diseases, smog and acid
rain.
Despite the latest findings by leading scientists, that establish a
clear link between the exposure to fluoride and lung and bladder
cancers in smelter workers, and despite health warnings Alcoa sent
out to 3000 of its workers worldwide the CDC stoically continues to
deny that there could be any problems. Its repeated claims are a
clear indication of the way the South African public is being
purposefully misled.
“Fluoride occurs naturally in the environment” and “there are no
problems in Richard’s Bay, so why should we believe that there will
be any here?” are some of their favourite war cries. Whether or not
Fluoride or any of the other toxic substances occur naturally in the
environment or not is entirely beside the point – exposure to large
amounts of any of them can and will have disastrous consequences.
As for the claims that “all is well in Richard’s Bay”: various
environmental organisations, including the Richard’s Bay Clean Air
Association and Groundwork most certainly differ with this point of
view. Richard’s Bay’s residents are exposed to smog and pollution on
a daily basis, with aluminium smelters being the prime suspects.
And let’s not forget the issue of global warming – 1,8tons of Carbon
dioxide is produced for every ton of Aluminium. That means that
Aluminium smelters produce almost double the amount of CO2 as actual
Aluminium. This figure alone should be enough to warrant a
resounding “No” to the whole issue of aluminium smelters – which
would only create 1000 permanent jobs, mostly to skilled and
highly-skilled workers.
Another worrying factor is the fact that the issue of what will
happen to the waste produced by the smelter has still not been
clarified. The spent pot linings (spl) for example is hazardous
waste and needs to be stored in sealed water-proof containers. We
would like to know where exactly these will be stored and how it
will be guaranteed that there will be no leakages and seeping of
toxins into our water?There are also serious concerns about the dust
of the raw material, which without doubt will be easily spread by
the wind. How does Alcan/the CDC plan to protect us form this?
Various community activists and environmentalists have presented
suggestions and plans for environmentally friendly alternatives,
which include a multifaceted approach that combines agriculture,
marine-culture, eco-tourism and the massive expansion of
infrastructure – however, these seem to have been ignored and now we
are facing an onslaught from some of the world’s most toxic and
polluting industries, who are known to target developing nations in
their search for cheap labour and electricity.
We would like to remind the CDC, the South African government and
the general public that S 24 (1) of our Constitution guarantees that
“everyone has the right a) to an environment that is not harmful to
their health or well-being; and b) to have the environment
protected…” Future generations need to be considered when making
decisions that effect our environment. No one with a child or
grandchild should therefore make the mistake to think that
environmental issues, especially those pertaining to Coega do not
concern them. To borrow a quote from Edmund Burke:"Nobody made a
greater mistake, than he who did nothing because he could do only a
little."
We sincerely hope that the South African government will have a
change of heart and reconsider the impact the proposed Coega
smelters will have on the South Africa’s environment and therefore
its citizens and follow the rest of the world in trying to find an
environmentally friendly and sustainable path to job creation. The
South African public on the other hand needs to become more
informed, involved and concerned, otherwise it will not be “the
cloud of poverty making it impossible to think” as Mrs. Vika put it
in her article in the Herald, but a cloud of an entirely different -
more toxic – nature altogether. |
